o Context, o Planning and management, and o Interpersonal.
Read more: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718920300276?casa_token=fEB b1CdLrAYAAAAA:zMcHquSn57l0KWMs4n0qmHlVikOOJOCDnKAVJSZj4Fsci0nhi0AUB EtHVpklPCHOQ8JRM5yzx5o
References : Ghere, G., King, J. A., Stevahn, L., & Minnema, J. (2006). A professional development unit for reflecting on program evaluator competencies. American Journal of Evaluation , 27(1), 108-123. Rodgers, M. S., Hillaker, B. D., Haas, B. E., & Peters, C. (2012). Taxonomy for assessing evaluation competencies in Extension. Journal of Extension [On-line]. 50(4) Article 4FEA2. Available at https://joe.org/joe/2012august/a2.php Human Subjects Research The Common Rule for the protection of research participants is codified in the Code of Federal Regulations (45 CFR Part 46). These regulations are grounded in the Belmont Report of 1979. This report was written in response to abuses of people in the name of research, as with medical experiments in Nazi Germany, and with such infamous cases as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and the case of Henrietta Lacks whose cells were harvested without her knowledge.
The Belmont Report provides three ethical guidelines that researchers should adhere to:
1. Respect for persons: Individuals should be treated as autonomous agents, and second, that persons with diminished autonomy are entitled to protection. This ethical guideline is applied through informed consent and voluntary participation in the research. 2. Beneficence: Persons are treated in an ethical manner not only by respecting their decisions and protecting them from harm, but also by making efforts to secure their well-being. This guideline is applied through participants understanding the risks and benefits of the research.
Powered by FlippingBook