Technology Acceptance Model in U.S. Extension: CRM Adoption

QUALITATIVE INVESTIGATION OF TAM

102

the wide usage of CRM technologies across various professional sectors, it was important to

craft a detailed description of the research context, population, and profile summary of each

participant in order for readers to evaluate the applicability of these findings in their own

professional contexts.

Participant Profiles

A descriptive summary of all 24 interview participants is provided below. The name of

each individual has been replaced by a pseudonym to protect the identity of the participants.

Additionally, the names of their respective land-grant universities are not stated and are simply

replaced by the geographic or Cooperative Extension region in which their university resides.

The summaries include some information about who these individuals are, their experience with

CRM technologies, and a brief overview of their responses to the questions in the semi-

structured interviews.

Annalise Grace

Annalise Grace is an Extension director in the northeastern region. She has previous

experience with CRM technologies, but her current institution is not currently using a CRM

system. Her previous experience includes the use of Salesforce. She defines CRM as lifecycle

contact management, project and task management, and email marketing. Annalise believes that

contact and data management, along with email marketing, are key benefits of CRM systems.

From her experience, she noted varied acceptance of the CRM among employees, with moderate

levels of employee resistance rooted in perceived usefulness. She states that the critical success

factors include leadership commitment, perceived usefulness, training and support, and an

integration strategy. Pre-adoption approaches used include organizational planning and

communications across the organization. Annalise identified costs and resources, data security,

Powered by