Technology Acceptance Model in U.S. Extension: CRM Adoption

QUALITATIVE INVESTIGATION OF TAM

118

CRM system and perceives it to be useful. Daniel reported that engagement tracking has

implications for outreach, engagement, and communications.

Josh Hartman (JH)

Josh Hartman is an Extension director at a university in the northeastern region. He is

currently evaluating the use of CRM technologies but has not selected a particular technology at

this time. His definition of CRM includes client engagement, and strategic marketing and

communications. Josh states the benefits are engagement and interaction tracking, reporting and

evaluation, and personalization. Josh believes that the critical success factors for CRM

implementation include training and support, strategic organizational planning, and leadership

commitment. His criteria for technology adoption include perceived ease of use, and costs and

resources. Additionally, he envisions vendor selection and pilot efforts as pre-adoption

approaches. Josh reported that training and support, as well as costs and resources, may be

potential adoption barriers. His university currently utilizes ad hoc solutions, and he views data

security and data privacy as a risk with CRM technologies. He perceives the software to be

useful, with improved user experience, strategic marketing, and communications as potential

implications for outreach, engagement, and communications.

David Benjamin

David Benjamin is an Extension director at a university in the southern region. His

university currently uses Modern Campus Destiny One as its CRM solution. David defines CRM

as lifecycle contact management and client engagement. He perceives reporting and evaluation,

revenue generation, and client insights as key benefits. He reports moderate success, the presence

of a local champion, varied acceptance among employees, and low employee resistance. The

reasons for employee resistance include data privacy, and costs and resources. David suggests

Powered by