Technology Acceptance Model in U.S. Extension: CRM Adoption

QUALITATIVE INVESTIGATION OF TAM

124

Adoption Success and Familiarity

Of the participants interviewed who reported utilizing CRM technologies, perceived

adoption success was measured as follows: low (31%), moderate (38%), high (25%), and none

(6%). An analysis of interview participants reporting the use of Salesforce ( n = 11) found rates

of perceived success as low (37.5%), moderate (25%), high (25%), and none (12.5%). The

reason for the specific analysis of Salesforce is because it is the most frequently used software

solution and the most frequently cited solution being considered by both landscape assessment

participants and interview participants. By comparison, interview participants reporting other

CRM solutions demonstrated slightly higher but comparable rates of perceived adoption success.

Additionally, interview participants were measured on their familiarity with CRM overall

and largely indicated an active use or awareness of CRM technologies, with 8% reporting no

familiarity at all. As outlined in the literature review, the presence of a local CRM champion may

have positive implications for CRM implementation and adoption. Interview participants were

measured on the presence of a local champion as yes (56.5%), no (30.4%), or unknown (13%).

Interview participants reported moderate acceptance of CRM technologies within their states. Of

the interview participants who currently use CRM, perceived employee acceptance was

identified as low acceptance (31%), varied acceptance (56%), and high acceptance (13%).

A statistical correlation analysis was also conducted to better understand the relationship

between reported adoption success and the presence of a location champion, and perceived ease

of use and the presence of a local champion. Regarding the relationship between the presence of

a local champion and reported adoption success, the correlation coefficient was 0.261, indicating

a positive correlation between the presence of a local CRM champion and reported adoption

success. However, while there is some association between the presence of a CRM champion

Powered by