Technology Acceptance Model in U.S. Extension: CRM Adoption

QUALITATIVE INVESTIGATION OF TAM

24

Chapter 2: Review of Literature

A direct search of existing literature was performed to gain insights from past studies on

CRM technologies in organizations. Most studies were successful in addressing critical success

factors, implementation failures, and adoption strategies, but no studies were able to successfully

address the adoption of CRM implementation in the CES. This literature review details CRM ’s

impact on organizational performance, adoption, and implementation successes and failures and

highlight s conceptual framework literature focused on Davis’ TAM.

This research aims to explore the successes, challenges, and opportunities of CRM in the

CES. The problem is that a significant number of land-grant university Extension programs are

not utilizing CRM technologies, despite evidence suggesting they would enhance their

communications efforts and their outreach and engagement mission. According to Judd (2019),

approximately 40% of all land-grant universities in the United States are utilizing CRM

technologies, and a significant portion of those are not commercial systems with industry-

standard features. Approximately 40% of these universities are evaluating the use of CRM

technologies, while the remaining have no plans to utilize CRM (Judd, 2019). The specific

problem to be addressed is identifying the barriers that exist in adopting CRM technologies in

the CES and what implications a lack of CRM usage has on communications, outreach, and

engagement efforts in the digital age.

Based on data from the assessment by Stephen Judd (2019) and the more recent

landscape assessment as part of this research, the TAM provides a solid model to examine the

perceived ease of use and the perceived usefulness of CRM systems in the CES, which may be a

variable for acceptance and adoption. This extensive review of literature examines the TAM in

the context of CRM systems, and one area of concern for many organizations, both within the

Powered by