Technology Acceptance Model in U.S. Extension: CRM Adoption

QUALITATIVE INVESTIGATION OF TAM

81

context, including the relationship of other issues in comparison to the innovation, how the

innovation is framed by both proponents and opponents, and the timing of the innovation itself

within the social ecosystem.

Related Literature

Another theory related to this research is Labus and Stone’s (2010) CRM behavior

theory. This theory represents seven interrelated models of CRM related to managing

organizational relationships with customers (Labus & Stone, 2010). This theory suggests that

taking a holistic view of the CRM concept across leadership, strategy, organization, process,

systems, customers, and measurements is necessary for successful CRM. The most interesting

thing about CRM behavior theory is that leadership and an integrated approach to CRM within

organizations are found to be critical, but software and technologies are not. In fact, this theory

suggests that software-centered approaches fail to deliver long-term results because these

approaches often do not consider issues within the organization, particularly organizational

culture.

Additionally, the TOE framework has been mentioned several times in this literature

review. This framework was originally developed by Tornatzky and Fleischer in 1990 to

examine how technology, environment, and organizational factors impact the adoption of new

methods, technologies, innovations, or ideas within an organization (Awa et al., 2017). Within

the umbrella of technology, the elements of perceived simplicity, compatibility, and

performance-expectancy are included. Additionally, normative pressures and mimetic pressures

are environmental factors that affect innovation adoption. Lastly, management support, size of

enterprises, and scope of business operations are all considered organizational factors that

influence adoption. More recent scholars, like Awa et al. (2017), have added individual factors

Powered by