Technology Acceptance Model in U.S. Extension: CRM Adoption

QUALITATIVE INVESTIGATION OF TAM

88

responsible for major decisions, including decisions about large-scale technology

implementations. Additionally, CES directors and administrators greatly benefit from

understanding the TAM and how it applies to CRM implementation in their Extension services

and among their faculty and staff. As indicated in the review of literature, one of the key reasons

for failure in CRM adoption, as it relates to technology acceptance, deals directly with employee

attitude and perceptions toward TAM variables such as ease of use and usefulness. CES directors

and administrators are positioned as critical leaders for CES organizations in every U.S. state and

territory, and their awareness of technology acceptance and adoption is critical for understanding

how CRM technology can be successfully applied in the CES.

However, not all CES directors and administrators may be well versed in CRM

technologies to fully engage in this study. This is another reason outlined in the literature review

for why CRM technology implementation can fail. For that reason, this study invites CES

directors and administrators to appoint another individual who has been tasked with CRM

implementation or evaluation at their institution. In most cases, this individual is likely a senior

administrator with a similar level of administrative responsibility as the CES director or

administrator, or an individual who has led CRM implementation in another organization within

the university setting. In some cases, this may be an information technology (IT) professional

who has been tasked with the implementation and administration of CRM technologies.

Purposive sampling is used, and participants are recruited from a sample of individuals from the

112 land-grant universities in the United States who work professionally for the CES. CES

directors and administrators are contacted and invited to participate in the survey, with the option

to refer participation to another individual within their respective institutions who can best

answer questions about CRM implementation, evaluation, discontinuance, or other plans for

Powered by