Technology Acceptance Model in U.S. Extension: CRM Adoption

QUALITATIVE INVESTIGATION OF TAM

89

CRM. The 112 land-grant universities are divided among three categories that refer to

congressional acts designating their institutions as land-grant institutions. This includes 58

institutions that are designated as 1862 land-grant universities, 19 institutions designated as 1890

land-grant universities, and 35 institutions designated as 1994 land-grant universities. After

completing the semi-structured interview, participants receive a follow-up survey with similar

questions. Purposive sampling enables the researcher to be deliberate about choosing participants

for this research to ensure familiarity with and knowledge of CRM systems within their

respective states and institutions. Additionally, purposive sampling provides a more well-

rounded picture of CRM usage, implementation, successes, and failures within any given land-

grant university.

Procedures

An email is delivered to Extension directors and administrators at all land-grant

universities. The email explains the purpose of this research and states that the results are shared

with the system. The email contains the following information to help ensure it is disseminated

to the appropriate people within each land-grant university:

1. The researcher is examining CRM technologies in the CES and would like your input on

the usage of these technologies.

2. This interview takes up to one hour to complete, and the information is used as part of a

larger research project to understand the opportunities, challenges, and successes of CRM

for the CES and what lessons can be learned across the system.

3. This data is also shared back with you when it is complete.

4. We ask that you, or one individual from your Extension organization responsible for

CRM administration or evaluation, participate in this research.

Powered by